International FootballUS 50% Tariff on Canadian Hockey Gear: The Sports Industry Faces a Price Shock

US 50% Tariff on Canadian Hockey Gear: The Sports Industry Faces a Price Shock

Mỹ áp thuế 50% lên thiết bị khúc côn cầu nhập từ Canada, có thể đẩy giá gậy, giày trượt và đồ bảo hộ tăng thêm 50-100 USD mỗi sản phẩm tại Mỹ. Canada chiếm khoảng 8,5% nguồn cung nhập khẩu. Doanh số ngành Mỹ tăng 45,4% giai đoạn 2020-2025, nhưng đà tăng người chơi 7% có nguy cơ chậm lại. Sự kiện chính: - Mỹ áp thuế 50% lên thiết bị khúc côn cầu nhập từ Canada. - Canada cung cấp khoảng 8,5% thiết bị khúc côn cầu nhập khẩu của Mỹ. - Doanh số ngành Mỹ tăng 45,4% từ 2020 đến 2025. - Lượng người chơi tại Mỹ tăng 7% trong ba năm gần nhất. - Bauer, CCM, True Hockey, Roustan Hockey là các thương hiệu chịu ảnh hưởng trực tiếp. Nguồn: phân tích nội bộ; ngày xuất bản gốc không nêu. Hỏi đáp: - Giá gậy khúc côn cầu tăng bao nhiêu? Dự kiến tăng thêm 50-100 USD mỗi cây. - Người chơi có thể bỏ môn không? Có, nếu các gia đình không chịu nổi chi phí tăng thêm. - Các hãng Canada có dời sản xuất? Roustan Hockey cam kết giữ nhà máy tại Canada, nhưng xu hướng dịch chuyển dài hạn vẫn mở.

The North American hockey equipment industry is entering a risky new phase as the US government imposes a 50% tariff on imports from Canada. Sticks, skates and goalie gear, already significantly more expensive after a long wave of inflation, now face the risk of another price jump just as the sport is attracting more participants. Industry data painted a healthy picture before the tariff shock. US equipment sales grew 45.4% between 2026 and 2026. Domestic participation recorded a 7% increase over three consecutive years. Canada is not the only source, accounting for about 8.5% of total hockey equipment imports by value into the US, but it is home to factories making high-end sticks and skates for major brands such as Bauer, CCM, True Hockey and Roustan Hockey. A 50% tariff therefore hits directly at the most important segment of the market. Experienced executives such as Todd Smith and John Merola argue that tariff costs cannot be fully absorbed. If companies pass costs on to retail prices, each stick could rise by $50-$100. For a family with two or three children playing hockey, the seasonal bill could increase by hundreds of dollars. That is one of the easiest expenses to cut when household budgets are still under inflationary pressure. Tariffs do not create an immediate one-time effect, however. The history of trade disputes shows that manufacturers often absorb costs for a while to protect market share. But that waiting period does not last forever. Once cash flow is squeezed long enough, higher costs are passed down to distributors and consumers. The lag between tariff announcement and actual shelf prices may make the true impact hard to measure in the short term. The irony is that tariffs on Canada do not automatically bring production back to the US. American factories do not yet have the capacity to replace high-end stick and skate production lines built over decades in regions such as Ontario and Quebec. In the short term, US buyers will simply face higher prices. If tariffs remain permanent, companies are more likely to shift production to Asia rather than return to the US because labour costs and raw-material supply chains still offer clear advantages. No model can pinpoint exactly when new prices will reach retail shelves. The only certainty lies in the decisions of middle-income families. They may accept paying $50-$100 more for each stick, cut one weekly practice, or leave the sport entirely. If participation growth of 7% slows by the next registration period, industry leaders will understand that the tariff bill has finally come due.

US 50% Tariff on Canadian Hockey Gear: The Sports Industry Faces a Price Shock

US 50% Tariff on Canadian Hockey Gear: The Sports Industry Faces a Price Shock

US 50% Tariff on Canadian Hockey Gear: The Sports Industry Faces a Price Shock

Cầu thủ liên quan